Not that they could. Walter: I would propose that Mr. Rusk stuck around to deal with unfinished business. And once he did, then, well Lisa was free to finally purge herself of him. Maureen: How can we be sure? Walter: Nisi credideritis, non intelligentis. Maureen: I don't understand. Walter: Latin translation of Isaiah Maureen: "Unless you believe, you will not understand.
Maureen: God keep you and yours safe, Dr. Walter: And you, ma'am. Peter: At least they got you some nice balloons. Lisa: I guess they couldn't find ones that said, "Welcome back from the dead. Walter: Perhaps, if I could examine the girl, but you say her mother has refused that. FringeWiki Explore.
Explore Wikis Community Central. Improve this answer. DavRob60 Go Fox! Stupidity is always good thing. I mean they did not air it but who cares throw it in the second seasond. It all makes sense — John Demetriou. When watching the series on Dutch Netflix, it's positioned between seasons 1 and 2. Which did make some sense, regarding people coming back from apparent death and screaming gibberish.
But it probably would have been better before the final episode of the first season. Explains Agent Farnsworth's hair as well. Thank you for explaining this, was going a bit nuts. Upcoming Events. November Topic Challenge: Samuel R. Delany ends Nov Featured on Meta.
Now live: A fully responsive profile. Linked 5. Related 3. However, I've learned from watching this series closely to look for clues and patterns in the show. The question I ask myself is what makes the world of this episode different to the others. It's plain to see that this is from season one, because if you look closely at the pepsi billboard in times square it says "Happy 09", and is therefore from the '09 new year, and therefore season one.
It has also already been noted that if it was the 'other' reality, then Peter wouldn't be there. I suppose it could yet another reality, but that is highly unlikely. Other than the whole 'why is Charlie there' thing, this episode was very standard, very run-of-the-mill, and not that exciting. I was a little disappointed that they chose to air a previously unseen story rather than create a new one that helped explain the other universe more. There is a mention of an observer at the church, but no dialog - therefore much more in line with season 1, and not season 2 where they are given more airtime and actual speaking parts.
Therefore my vote is a old episode that did not fit the exact storyline from season 1 and overall was not that "exciting" , therefore it was shelved and resurrected when Fox needed to fill a time slot. My guess is that the marketing people insinuated the "alternate universe" to have people watch the episode - but it the alt universe were true, the scenes would have that "older" look - remember when Olivia was in the two different Broyles offices?
Lastly the whole episode is kinda dark - very similar to Season 1 - while the season 2 is more crisp aka more budget. Good episode.. Thought we left him behind on "Dream Logic" episode. Maybe could have been a great story to give him some kind of re-birth in any way writers can make it happen..
As usual the rest of the cast they all were great. Can anyone give a clue about why Charlie's character is back on this episode? Well, I guess we're all dying to find out for sure. On the fox message boards it's said to be an unaired episode. Can it be so, that people forgot that maybe Fox is in on the mysteries too? Because all in all, things may turn up being more complicated and mysterious than we think.
Lets not take what we read for granted. Let your eyes and mind concentrate on what the episodes offer instead.
Now, I'm not going to speculate on the other mentioned mysteries, regarding agent Charlie Francis and a possible alternate universe - These questions are as obvious as can be. They may never be answered. All I know is this: The episode was stunning, and I can not see why it wouldn't fit into the first season - or any season for that matter.
Plenty of "what's going on now? What puzzled me the most, which by the way is not listed in any reviews of this EP so far, and I may well have slipped this information, why does the girl, Lisa, tell Olivia in the end of the episode, that she's going to be 18 next month or next year, can't remember , and then finishes off saying: "Don't wait too long to make your move"?
Makes more sense than following: She asked if Olivia was Peters girlfriend, but he promptly said she's a girl who is a friend. This however does not make sense at all, in context of what she said to Olivia. It really puzzles me. All in all a good episode that brought up many questions. We may all have been fooled a bit, and maybe not. Time will tell! Third Universe? If this is a never-before-aired episode, I agree, they should have said something somewhere letting us know instead of wondering.
But that's why I like this show: it has the X-Files vibe that I enjoy so much. Or what if it's still the '1st' universe, did they bring Charlie over from the other 2nd universe? Again, will Ma show up? I paused the DVR and searched the Fox site thinking I must have missed an episode where he was suddenly resurrected somehow, but no. Why didn't Fox just tout this as a "never-before aired" ep from Season One?
It would have allowed me to enjoy this without distraction so much more easily. Other than my utter confusion at seeing Charlie, it was another strong episode. And fun to catch the Observer walk by behind Olivia on the Cathedral steps. I just watched this episode, which is clearly out of sync with the storyline as we see it now in Season 2. When I went into the fox episode discussion board, where Unearthed is listed as season 1 episode 21 - an unaired episode of season 1.
So the deeper meaning behind seeing Charlie again is Fox really should have said something to make it clearer on the front end, but it seems the mystery is solved.
Overall, I thought it was an engaging episode and, as others have said, the teenage girl gave a very good performance , but it didn't seem to do much to contribute to the overall mythology of the show. I wish there had been more of a reason to air it - filling in a blank from season 1 or something. But still, I found it enjoyable and interesting.
I agree with the other reviews that this is unaired episode. Agent Charlie Francis is dead in the first universe and Peter Bishop was taken from the second universe so neither of those universes are accurate in this episode. It doesn't follow the story line and seems like a filler episode.
I noticed that Astrid's Hair style is still the same from season one. In season two her hairstyle changes and is shorter. If the story later reveils that there is a third universe this would be a good cover up for not releasing this episode last season although Astrid's hairstyle is still the same. Either way the episode was enjoyable.
Just watched it in the UK. Sky told us it was a special unaired episode in preparation for the continuation of the second series, so I kinda guessed it wouldn't fit in with the rest.
Not a bad episode I thought, and was a standalone episode like a Pilot, perhaps? Regarding one reviewer asking why Lisa telling Olivia in the end of the episode, that she's going to be 18 next month or next year, can't remember , and then finishes off saying: "Don't wait too long to make your move"?
0コメント